Get interview advice

All professors are not the same, therefore their selection criteria may differ. However, there are certain key criteria that most professors look for when selecting candidates.


Interest for the subject matter. You need to establish that you have a desire to work on the project you are studying. If you have an interview, it can show if you talk about recent articles published from the lab, articles in the field, and some ideas aims you hope to accomplish in the project. If you don’t have an interview, then you need to establish early on in your email communications to the professor that you have looked at several papers already on the topic. You should always ask for references to other papers the professor thinks would be of interest to you.

 

Good grades. Good grades say a lot. If a professor receives multiple applications for a single undergraduate research position, then often or not, the filter will be the undergrad GPA. However, I have often seen students with stellar GPA, but lack a good work ethic in the laboratory, interacted poorly with other lab members, or have an inability to just do the physical work despite having a great ability to plan an experiment.

 

Recommendations. The power of the recommendation is understated. Recommendations are critical when applying for extremely research competitive positions. The recommendation can come from a course you took, from another undergrad in the lab you want to join, or from a graduate or postdoc which you have gotten to know prior to applying for a research position. Recommendations go beyond your list of accomplishments. They reveal into your personal skills

If I was to produce a list on what makes a great research mentor, it would be a tremendous diservice to everyone. Just as every undergrad is different, every research mentor is different. Some undergrads prefer a mentor that micromanages every aspect of the lab whereas some undergrads want to be given the research tools and space to produce great research. Some mentors will always praise the undergrad but other mentors will critize them objectively. Such a spectrum of personalities and management styles provide students many choices. Ultimately, the research mentor's goal is to develop you into a critical thinker and prepare you for a future career in the sciences, medicine, law, or wherever you so desire. Mentors will be there throughout your life and extend well beyond the few years you are working in his/her laboratory. They will provide you with letters of recommendation for graduate/professional school and independent advice on your career choices. Plain and simple, there is no real answer to "What makes a great Research mentor?" However, all mentors share a common desire to have you do bigger and better things for many years to come.

Don't write lengthy letters.

"Keep it simple!" If you need to write a letter to update your interviewer on something positive that may have happened after your interview, then write about it.  Something positive would be your scientific or literary publication is now "IN PRESS" and not some potential publication (which for many interviewers doesn't count for anything). If a manuscript is being written, ask your research supervisor to mention it in their letter since it will carry more weight than if you just put it on your AMCAS application.

 

There is no need to reiterate what is on your application already. Don't write a quick summary of your application in this letter. Think of this letter as an addendum to your application.

 

More Articles...

Page 27 of 28

<< Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next > End >>